“The problem
is that the villagers that we deal with are made up of two groups: those that
are willing to listen to what we have to say, and those that do not care to
listen because they have their own agenda,” explained the director of The Loei
Office of Natural Resources and Environment. This was not the first time our
student group had heard such a sentiment. Throughout Unit 5, an underlying
theme that we encountered was the fact that the government and villagers are
unwilling to work together. Resistance is the name of the game. Neither side
will budge. No wonder efforts for substantial progress are at a standstill. At
this rate, compromise is an unlikely occurrence.
This
mutual stubbornness from the government and the villagers concerning the
development of dams and mines in the Isaan region really resonated with me.
Throughout the units leading up to Unit 5, I found myself frustrated and
confused due to the lack of compromise between both sides. I did not understand
why it was so hard to put aside their differences, create some sort of an
agreement and cooperate in harmony. But this unit finally provided me with the
answer I was searching for.
The
Loei Office of Natural Resources and Environment is a government ministry
department that focuses on environmental control, resource management, and
environmental restoration in Thailand. Although they identify themselves as an
environmental organization, after exchanging with them it did not seem as
through their job description involved much in the way of protecting the
environment of the local villages directly affected by the gold mine. Instead,
it seemed as though what their job truly entails is conducting research into
the cyanide and arsenic contaminations in the water, and then sending that
information off to the health office to deal with. When you look at it from
this perspective, it makes sense that the villagers are not entirely willing to
cooperate with this office, because they do not actually aid the villagers. And
besides, the office is a government ministry department, so it is no wonder
that the villagers are reluctant to work with them in solidarity.
On
the other hand, the villagers claim that the government never holds a space to
educate them on the projects that are destroying their way of life. Sometimes
the government even resolves to evicting them entirely before initiating the
construction process. During our exchange with the villagers of Kok Wao and Na
Nong Bong, we learned that public participation rarely happens when the
government constructs such projects. As Sadsai Sang-Sok, an NGO and member of
the Thai People Don’t Want Nuclear Power Plants Network, told our group during
Unit 4, “if the government wants to build a dam, then it probably just will
anyways without consulting the villagers at all prior to its construction.” It
seems as though public opinion does not factor into the decisions made by the
local Thai government, and this is an alarming problem. Without public
participation, a crucial part of any public project, the villagers are truly
blindsided. This lack of transparency between the government and the villagers
is disturbing, and reveals just how corrupt the current process in place for
the construction of such a project is. The government decides on a project, and
without notifying the villagers, begins said project, fully disregarding how it
may affect the villagers.
In
our exchange with Governor Phonsak Chiaranai, we were told that the local
government has attempted to hold forums for the villagers in order to notify
and educate them on current projects, but that no one shows up. However, with
the villagers speaking in one of our ears and the government speaking in the
other, it is difficult to sort out the truth from the lies. Hearing these
conflicting perspectives has helped me make sense of the situation of the gold
mine in Loei province as well as the other issues we have previously studied
this semester, specifically dams and land rights. Unfortunately, it has also
left me feeling less hopeful that justice will eventually be restored to the
villagers. Perhaps the dream for compromise is just wishful thinking. But one
thing is for certain: the government is never going to become an institution
that is powerless and at the mercy of the villagers. The villagers need to
understand that, and the government needs to be upfront with the villagers in
terms of the projects that will directly affect their livelihood. Moving
forward, both sides need to swallow their pride and meet halfway. Without
compromise, substantial progress is unlikely to occur in upcoming years.
Sean Burke
University of Pennsylvania
1 comment:
1. Sean, just wanted to start of and say that I really enjoyed your blog post. My name is Annie Safar and I’m studying at the University of Washington in Seattle. Right now I have been studying in the Dominican Republic for almost four months with the CIEE Service Learning program, while also working at a community-recycling center. After reading your blog about the difficulties in community organizing between governmental agencies and villagers, the sentiments of frustration and not knowing why a middle ground could not be reached are more then familiar. As the first of it’s kind, the recycling center in the DR has faced many obstacles in becoming operational; mainly due to the fact that there is not sufficient infrastructure or governmental support to accommodate this project. I appreciated how you discussed both perspectives of the issue, the villagers and the governmental agencies before formulating your own opinion. I feel like as a student abroad this seemingly simple, yet difficult to do, ability is key. I hope you are enjoying your experience abroad and again thanks for the blog post!
Post a Comment